WHEN President John Magufuli of Tanzania holding the position that his
country does not sign the Treaty of the Economic Partnership (EPA) with
the European Union (EU) to several flaws when corrected, some
legislators EU have supported him and warn the current contract will
kill local industries.
Several days ago, the position of Tanzania and Burundi which obliges
countries of the East African Community (EAC), agree to move forward all
zisaini agreement or treaty or to allow further analysis.
Already countries of Kenya, Uganda and Rwanda have agreed with the
agreement of the EPA, while Tanzania and Burundi had imposed heavy
economic reasons, aimed at ensuring that before signing the treaty, it
is preferable to the issue of protection of domestic industries considered
The agreement should be signed by all the countries to begin to serve the entire region.
Under
an agreement that his discussion started since 2007, EU promises to
give the product from the zone of the East African market for tax-free
status been transferred to Councils for the member states of Europe, but
by itself will bring its products to market zone without taxation. However, the position of Tanzania rides in the protection of domestic
industries, especially this time ikijikita government more in the
industrial economy.
The current position is supported by two members of the EU, Marie
Arena and Julie Ward, who advised the East African isisaini partnership
treaty with the way you are now.
In a special interview with the author of a network of renowned
magazine of The New Times, the MPs stated that the decision of the Heads
of State of East Africa to postpone until next year the signing of the
joint venture in order to reflect more accurate you are.
"We believe this agreement in a way it is now is not right. Europe send to Kenya which has a greater interest in this agreement have as their shield. While Kenya already developed industrialized, so it's not like Tanzania, Uganda and Burundi, which are not will benefit.
"If European products will be allowed to enter only in the East
African region will create unfair competition with those countries will
lose more tax on some products and some industries competition they
failed to die," say the MPs.
Lawmakers quoted stressing that due to the situation, have volunteered
to help countries like Tanzania and Africa in general pressure on
European countries to renew Review each of the joint ventures and
establish a new system beneficial to all parties.
"We
think these countries should wait until all when it has enter in
middle-income economy, then can get deals like this that make commercial
competition. In Rwanda and other countries of the EAC we see at the moment they
first established their home market in the region, "adding that the MPs.
MPs
have said they clarified that currently Kenya, which alredy has enter in
middle-income economies may benefit, but warn other countries will
benefit from the EPA until they reach between economy. When asked why as European parliamentarians, still oppose the deal
will kaoipa economic benefits for their community, the legislators
responded:
"Our point is not to resist trade with East Africa, we want to see this partnership is beneficial for both sides. We have information that many researchers from the International
Centre for Trade showing that this agreement will be a loss for the East
African Community. "
Lawmakers
are increasingly debilitated that enters clarify that deals with Europe
and Africa had impact resulting in poverty, including many in Africa
and its consequences detrimental to Europe, including an increase in
illegal immigrants

Post a Comment